inverse dynamics tool Search Results


inverse dynamics tool  (OpenSim Ltd)
90
OpenSim Ltd inverse dynamics tool
Comparisons of average, absolute joint moments and powers across stance and swing for the four participants from Experiment 3. We compared moments and powers produced during natural running (dark red) to those produced during exotendon running. Average kinetics during exotendon runs were separated into the exotendon contribution (blue) and the biological contribution (light red). We report the p-values resulting from two-tailed paired t-tests comparing biological contributions to kinetics in natural and exotendon running below the axes (light red text) and comparing total kinetics in natural and exotendon runs above the bars (light blue). Asterisks indicate comparisons that were significant after Holm-Šidák corrections (alpha = 0.05). When running with the exotendon, during swing, hip, knee and ankle biological moments are reduced compared to natural running, as is knee power. During stance, hip and knee biological moments are reduced, along with knee and ankle powers. These reductions in biological moments suggest savings are achieved in both swing and stance. Total moments at the hip and knee, as well as total knee power, increased, demonstrating that adopting these <t>kinematics</t> without an exotendon would require additional effort compared to natural running.
Inverse Dynamics Tool, supplied by OpenSim Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/inverse+dynamics+tool/inverse+dynamics+tool/bio_rxiv__474650-169-20-20
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
inverse dynamics tool - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
inverse dynamic (id) analyses  (OpenSim Ltd)
90
OpenSim Ltd inverse dynamic (id) analyses
Comparisons of average, absolute joint moments and powers across stance and swing for the four participants from Experiment 3. We compared moments and powers produced during natural running (dark red) to those produced during exotendon running. Average kinetics during exotendon runs were separated into the exotendon contribution (blue) and the biological contribution (light red). We report the p-values resulting from two-tailed paired t-tests comparing biological contributions to kinetics in natural and exotendon running below the axes (light red text) and comparing total kinetics in natural and exotendon runs above the bars (light blue). Asterisks indicate comparisons that were significant after Holm-Šidák corrections (alpha = 0.05). When running with the exotendon, during swing, hip, knee and ankle biological moments are reduced compared to natural running, as is knee power. During stance, hip and knee biological moments are reduced, along with knee and ankle powers. These reductions in biological moments suggest savings are achieved in both swing and stance. Total moments at the hip and knee, as well as total knee power, increased, demonstrating that adopting these <t>kinematics</t> without an exotendon would require additional effort compared to natural running.
Inverse Dynamic (Id) Analyses, supplied by OpenSim Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/inverse+dynamics+tool/inverse+dynamics++id++tool/pmc11529311-136-2-1
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
inverse dynamic (id) analyses - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
4.4 inverse dynamics tool  (OpenSim Ltd)
90
OpenSim Ltd 4.4 inverse dynamics tool
Comparisons of average, absolute joint moments and powers across stance and swing for the four participants from Experiment 3. We compared moments and powers produced during natural running (dark red) to those produced during exotendon running. Average kinetics during exotendon runs were separated into the exotendon contribution (blue) and the biological contribution (light red). We report the p-values resulting from two-tailed paired t-tests comparing biological contributions to kinetics in natural and exotendon running below the axes (light red text) and comparing total kinetics in natural and exotendon runs above the bars (light blue). Asterisks indicate comparisons that were significant after Holm-Šidák corrections (alpha = 0.05). When running with the exotendon, during swing, hip, knee and ankle biological moments are reduced compared to natural running, as is knee power. During stance, hip and knee biological moments are reduced, along with knee and ankle powers. These reductions in biological moments suggest savings are achieved in both swing and stance. Total moments at the hip and knee, as well as total knee power, increased, demonstrating that adopting these <t>kinematics</t> without an exotendon would require additional effort compared to natural running.
4.4 Inverse Dynamics Tool, supplied by OpenSim Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/inverse+dynamics+tool/4+4+inverse+dynamics+tool/10__5829_slash_ije__2024__37__10a__20-82-4-1
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
4.4 inverse dynamics tool - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
torque generated by the opensim inverse dynamic tool  (OpenSim Ltd)
90
OpenSim Ltd torque generated by the opensim inverse dynamic tool
Comparisons of average, absolute joint moments and powers across stance and swing for the four participants from Experiment 3. We compared moments and powers produced during natural running (dark red) to those produced during exotendon running. Average kinetics during exotendon runs were separated into the exotendon contribution (blue) and the biological contribution (light red). We report the p-values resulting from two-tailed paired t-tests comparing biological contributions to kinetics in natural and exotendon running below the axes (light red text) and comparing total kinetics in natural and exotendon runs above the bars (light blue). Asterisks indicate comparisons that were significant after Holm-Šidák corrections (alpha = 0.05). When running with the exotendon, during swing, hip, knee and ankle biological moments are reduced compared to natural running, as is knee power. During stance, hip and knee biological moments are reduced, along with knee and ankle powers. These reductions in biological moments suggest savings are achieved in both swing and stance. Total moments at the hip and knee, as well as total knee power, increased, demonstrating that adopting these <t>kinematics</t> without an exotendon would require additional effort compared to natural running.
Torque Generated By The Opensim Inverse Dynamic Tool, supplied by OpenSim Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/inverse+dynamics+tool/torque+generated+by+the+opensim+inverse+dynamic+tool/10__1016_slash_j__robot__2018__11__011-155-30-34
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
torque generated by the opensim inverse dynamic tool - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Comparisons of average, absolute joint moments and powers across stance and swing for the four participants from Experiment 3. We compared moments and powers produced during natural running (dark red) to those produced during exotendon running. Average kinetics during exotendon runs were separated into the exotendon contribution (blue) and the biological contribution (light red). We report the p-values resulting from two-tailed paired t-tests comparing biological contributions to kinetics in natural and exotendon running below the axes (light red text) and comparing total kinetics in natural and exotendon runs above the bars (light blue). Asterisks indicate comparisons that were significant after Holm-Šidák corrections (alpha = 0.05). When running with the exotendon, during swing, hip, knee and ankle biological moments are reduced compared to natural running, as is knee power. During stance, hip and knee biological moments are reduced, along with knee and ankle powers. These reductions in biological moments suggest savings are achieved in both swing and stance. Total moments at the hip and knee, as well as total knee power, increased, demonstrating that adopting these kinematics without an exotendon would require additional effort compared to natural running.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Connecting the legs with a spring improves human running economy

doi: 10.1101/474650

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparisons of average, absolute joint moments and powers across stance and swing for the four participants from Experiment 3. We compared moments and powers produced during natural running (dark red) to those produced during exotendon running. Average kinetics during exotendon runs were separated into the exotendon contribution (blue) and the biological contribution (light red). We report the p-values resulting from two-tailed paired t-tests comparing biological contributions to kinetics in natural and exotendon running below the axes (light red text) and comparing total kinetics in natural and exotendon runs above the bars (light blue). Asterisks indicate comparisons that were significant after Holm-Šidák corrections (alpha = 0.05). When running with the exotendon, during swing, hip, knee and ankle biological moments are reduced compared to natural running, as is knee power. During stance, hip and knee biological moments are reduced, along with knee and ankle powers. These reductions in biological moments suggest savings are achieved in both swing and stance. Total moments at the hip and knee, as well as total knee power, increased, demonstrating that adopting these kinematics without an exotendon would require additional effort compared to natural running.

Article Snippet: After low-pass filtering the marker positions at 15 Hz (4th order, zero-phase shift Butterworth), we computed joint angles using the OpenSim inverse kinematics tool.

Techniques: Produced, Two Tailed Test